Monday, August 18, 2014
Mining Giant 'Grupo Mexico' Befouls Northern Sonora Rivers
Frontera NorteSur
A Mexican federal official has accused the mining giant
Grupo Mexico with concealing an August 5 toxic spill that contaminated two rivers in the northern border state of Sonora.
Cesar Lagarda Lagarda, northwestern division
chief for the National Water Commission (Conagua), said in a press conference that Grupo Mexico “deliberately hid the
failure” of a waste storage facility that held a mixture of sulfuric acid and heavy metals from its Cananea copper mine,
which is located south of the Arizona-Sonora border.
The
toxic soup first spilled into the Bacanuchi River, before entering the Sonora River and threatening water supplies for downstream
communities and the state capital of Hermosillo. The pollution was first noticed by local residents who were surprised to
see the Sonora River transformed into an odd, orange color. Residents also feared contamination of their groundwater.
Lagarda reported that authorities have detected excessive
levels of arsenic, cadmium, aluminum, iron, manganese, nickel, and copper near the municipality of Baviacora, as well as dead
fish. The official warned of long-term, fatal effects to cattle. An estimated 10 million gallons of toxic material spilled
from Grupo Mexico’s property.
Belatedly
informed of the incident, Conagua restricted water usage in the municipalities of Arizpe, San Felipe de Jesus, Aconchi, Ures,
Banamichi, and Baviacora. Subsequently, authorities distributed bottled and trucked-in water. To stem the pollution, lime
was released in the Sonora River.
The
Sonora River ecosystem provides habitat and water for white-tailed deer, bobcats, coyotes, birds, javelinas, and other creatures.
According to the Federal Attorney General
for Environmental Protection, state and local authorities are in charge of the environmental emergency response per protocol,
with federal back-up support.
Conagua sources
said Grupo Mexico could be fined about US$1 million for the spill, though under Mexican law any fine could be appealed. In
addition, Lagarda stressed that Grupo Mexico will be responsible for paying for the environmental containment and clean-up
costs.
On another front, the
Sonora State Human Rights Commission confirmed that it had accepted a citizen complaint regarding the spill. It wasn’t
immediately clear from Mexican press reports if any government agency had conducted recent inspections of the Cananea waste
storage unit that ruptured.
On an August
13 visit to Sonora, Environment Secretary Juan Jose Guerra Abud said Grupo Mexico did not inform officials of the spill until
24 hours after it happened, further charging that Grupo Mexico has not subsequently provided accurate information to authorities
about the origin or consequences of the spill.
Guerra
reiterated federal support to the Sonora state government for resolving the toxic waste problem “as soon as possible.”
Up to now, Grupo Mexico has not released a public statement on the matter.
The spill raised concerns about damage to Sonoran agriculture, livestock raising and the cattle export business
to the United States. Luis Sierra Maldonado, president of the Sonora Regional Livestock Union, said there had been no reports
so far of cattle affected by the contamination.
But
Sierra warned that no animals or humans should drink from wells within 1,500 feet of the Bacanuchi and Sonora rivers. He also
had other strong recommendations: “First of all, retire livestock from the margins of the river. Secondly, suspend the
consumption of milk and the making of cheese. Third, be very aware of any alternative sources of water that can be counted
on.”
Occurring in an arid region
that has been doubly slammed with drought, the August 5 spill could aggravate another environmental problem. Quoted in the
local press, Sonora Governor Guillermo Padres Elias said the disaster did not impact the water supply of the state capital.
“I don’t have information
right now about the (contamination) level, but Conagua’s recommendation was not to use the water from (El Molinito Reservoir),
and I agree,” Padres said. “Thankfully, we have the Independence Aqueduct that is going to supply the city of
Hermosillo with water.”
The object
of continued legal battles, the aqueduct Padres spoke of is fiercely opposed by Sonora’s Yaqui people, who are engaged
in a national protest caravan against the project. Yaqui leaders contend the aqueduct siphons away water vital for the tribe’s
agriculture and cultural survival in order to support urban and export-oriented industrial growth in Hermosillo.
——————————
Sources:
El Diario de Sonora, August 13 and 14, 2014. Articles by Jesus Esquer. Milenio.com, August 12, 2014. Article by Felipe
Larios and editorial staff. La Jornada, August 12, 2014. Article by Ulises Gutierrez Ruelas. Proceso, August 10, 2014.
Reprinted with authorization from Frontera NorteSur, a free, on-line, U.S.-Mexico border news source; translation FNS.
Frontera NorteSur (FNS)
Center for Latin American and Border Studies
New Mexico
State University
Las Cruces, New Mexico