Monday, July 16, 2012
Stone Presents Mexican Drug War Fabrications as Facts
On the publicity circuit to promote his new
movie, director Oliver Stone has made a series of assertions about Mexico and the war on drugs that are not only false, but promote a dangerously misleading
view of the country's criminal groups.
In a recent interview on "Piers
Morgan Tonight," Stone used a series of unfounded statistical assertions to justify his opposition to the war on drugs,
the theme of his movie "Savages" which opened in the US earlier this month. Among his comments, as compiled by the Los Angeles Times:
"The Mexican economy would
die without [drugs] because they need the money. It goes into their legitimate economy. It's bigger than tourism. It's
bigger than oil. It's bigger than remissions from their Mexican emigrants back to their country ... Fifty percent of our
prison system is victimless crimes. People who've never hurt anybody, they're in for marijuana and it has nothing
to do with punishment. It's a medical issue, and I think we have to move to decriminalization and legalization."
Stone is right to point out that the mass incarceration of drug offenders is demonstrably
inefficient and in many senses immoral, but his facts are incorrect. Drug offenders do not constitute 50 percent of the US
prison system's inmates, but just over 20 percent. There are certainly more effective and humane ways to deal with the issue than tossing
these people behind bars, but the opponents of the largely mindless approach to drug policy that has dominated in the last
40 years only hurt their case by casually tossing out falsehoods.
problem continues with Stone's statement that flows of drug money in Mexico are larger than those from tourism, oil, or
remittances. Estimates for the value of the Mexican drug trade are all over the map, but the most rigorous analyses have concluded that export revenue from the drug trade is far lower than Stone
suggests. Alejandro Hope, for instance, places the figure somewhere between $4.7 to $8.1 billion, while the RAND Corporation estimates that Mexican traffickers earn roughly $6.6 billion per year from sending drugs to
In contrast, remittances sent by Mexicans living abroad in 2011 amounted to $22.7 billion. Mexico's tourist trade, notwithstanding the
nation's unfortunate image in the international press, still managed to generate $11.9 billion in 2010. Stone's claim is even further from the mark with regard to oil: the revenues
for Pemex, the national oil company, amounted to $125 billion in 2011.
Consequently, Stone's statement
that the Mexican economy "would die" without drug money drifts into the terrain of the indefensible. Unfortunately,
Stone is not alone in this exaggerated view of drug money's role in the Mexican economy. One story, put forward by authors
like Richard Grant and Charles Bowden, holds that a 2001 study by CISEN, Mexico's intelligence agency, found that an
end to the drug trade would result in a 63 percent contraction of the Mexican economy.
The study is not public -- citing a story from El Diario de Juarez, Bowden wrote that it was leaked to the
media in 2001, though InSight Crime's online search for the original study turned up nothing. It is difficult to know,
therefore, if its authors were perhaps making a more nuanced point that was lost in subsequent references to it. However,
the scenario posited by Grant and Bowden, and the implicit idea that the Mexican economy would "die" without drug
money, is simply absurd.
The most obvious flaw is the very idea that drug
trafficking could disappear entirely. Though the size and composition of proceeds from the illicit trade may vary, longstanding
industries, especially those that feed upon deep-seated human desires, don't simply disappear from one year to the next.
Moreover, as demonstrated above, the total revenue generated by the drug trade is relatively
small. Even using a methodologically suspect high-end estimate, such as the $39 billion cited by the US National Drug Intelligence Center for revenues of all Colombian and Mexican organizations, and for the sake of argument
attributing all of the profits to the Mexican gangs, the figure still amounts to less than 4 percent of total Mexican output.
Using the more rigorous calculations of the industry's size, drug trafficking probably accounts for roughly 0.5 percent
of the nation's economy. Eliminating the proceeds of drug smuggling would certainly have a significant impact on the GDP,
but such an event, aside from being virtually impossible, would be nothing like the economic apocalypse posited by Stone.
Beyond simply being incorrect, Stone's comments fuel a dystopian narrative of Mexico
that has done the nation a great disservice over the past few years. They also help feed a belief that Mexico's criminals
are invincible supermen, against whom capitulation is the only solution.
is wrong, just like Stone's facts.
This commentary, "Oliver Stone Gets it Wrong on Mexico Drug War," was first published in InSight Crime, on Jul. 11, 2012 and reposted per a Creative Commons authorization. InSight
Crime's objective is to increase the level of research, analysis and investigation on organized crime in Latin America
and the Caribbean.
Patrick Corcoran (email@example.com) is a writer and international relations student who specializes in Mexican affairs.
He blogs at Gancho (http://www.ganchoblog.blogspot.com/).